Technical Guides
Lossy vs Lossless Compression - Complete Guide to Image Compression Types
Updated on August 27, 2025
Understanding lossy vs lossless compression helps you choose the right image format for your website. Lossy compression can reduce file sizes by up to 90% using algorithms like DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform), while lossless compression preserves every pixel perfectly using techniques like DEFLATE and Huffman coding.
How They Work
Technical differences between lossy and lossless compression methods.
File Size Benchmarks
Latest 2024-2025 performance data and compression ratios.
Technical Algorithms
DCT, DEFLATE, VP8, and AV1 compression algorithm deep dive.
Best Practices
Algorithm-based format selection and progressive enhancement.
Want Automatic Compression Optimization?
BunnyCDN automatically applies the best compression method for each image type. Photos, logos, etc - all optimized for maximum performance.
Try BunnyCDN with $5 Free Credit →
To claim, use "TheWPX" coupon on the billing page.
How Compression Works
1. Lossy Compression
Lossy compression reduces file size by permanently discarding image data that human eyes perceive as less important. It exploits psychovisual redundancy in human perception.
Technical process:
- Transform domain conversion - Converts spatial data to frequency domain using DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform)
- Quantization - Reduces precision of less perceptible frequency components
- Entropy encoding - Uses Huffman coding or arithmetic coding for final compression
- Achieves 10:1 to 50:1 compression ratios
Common lossy formats and algorithms:
- JPEG - Uses DCT + Huffman coding, 10:1 typical compression
- WebP Lossy - Based on VP8 video codec with better entropy coding
- AVIF - Uses AV1 codec, achieves 50% better compression than JPEG
2. Lossless Compression
Lossless compression reduces file size by eliminating statistical redundancy without losing any original data. Perfect reconstruction is always possible.
Technical process:
- Pattern recognition - Identifies repeating data patterns
- Dictionary encoding - Uses algorithms like LZ77 to replace patterns with shorter codes
- Entropy coding - Applies Huffman coding to reduce bit usage
- Achieves 2:1 to 10:1 compression ratios depending on image content
Common lossless formats and algorithms:
- PNG - Uses DEFLATE (LZ77 + Huffman coding) with filters
- WebP Lossless - Uses predictive coding with entropy encoding
- GIF - Uses LZW (Lempel-Ziv-Welch) compression
File Size Comparison (2024-2025 Benchmarks)
Based on latest performance research, here's how compression types perform:
Photo Compression (Original: 5MB, 1920x1080)
- Original uncompressed: 5MB (baseline)
- JPEG (quality 80): 400KB (92% reduction, 12.5:1 ratio)
- WebP Lossy (quality 80): 280KB (94.4% reduction, 17.8:1 ratio)
- AVIF (quality 70): 200KB (96% reduction, 25:1 ratio)
- PNG Lossless: 3.2MB (36% reduction, 1.5:1 ratio)
- WebP Lossless: 2.4MB (52% reduction, 2.1:1 ratio)
Logo/Graphics (Original: 2MB, text-heavy)
- Original uncompressed: 2MB (baseline)
- PNG Lossless: 320KB (84% reduction, 6.25:1 ratio for text images)
- WebP Lossless: 260KB (87% reduction, 7.7:1 ratio)
- JPEG (quality 90): 180KB (91% reduction, but visible artifacts on text)
- AVIF Lossless: 350KB (82.5% reduction, but 30x slower encoding)
Key finding: PNG excels at text-heavy images with lossless compression, while AVIF dominates photo compression with 60% better efficiency than JPEG.
Quality Comparison
When Lossy Works Well
Photography and complex images:
- Quality loss is barely noticeable
- File size reduction is huge (70-90%)
- Perfect for web use
- Human eyes can't detect small losses
When Lossless is Essential
Graphics with sharp edges:
- Text must remain crisp and readable
- Logo colours must be exact
- Screenshots need perfect clarity
- Graphics with few colours compress well losslessly
Quality Loss Examples
Acceptable quality loss (use lossy):
- Nature photos
- People photos
- Artistic images
- Background images
Unacceptable quality loss (use lossless):
- Company logos
- Text-heavy images
- Technical diagrams
- Screenshots with text
Performance Impact
Computational Performance (2024 Benchmarks)
- JPEG encoding: Fastest (1x baseline)
- PNG encoding: 2-3x slower than JPEG
- WebP encoding: 5-10x slower than JPEG
- AVIF encoding: 30x slower than JPEG (but superior compression)
Loading Speed Analysis
- AVIF: 50% faster loading than JPEG (due to smaller file size)
- WebP: 30% faster loading than JPEG
- PNG: 3-5x slower than JPEG for photos, faster for simple graphics
- Processing overhead: AVIF requires more CPU for decoding
Technical Features & Compression Algorithms
DCT (Discrete Cosine Transform) - JPEG Foundation
The DCT converts image blocks from spatial domain to frequency domain, enabling selective removal of high-frequency components (details humans perceive less).
Process:
- Split image into 8x8 pixel blocks
- Apply DCT to convert to frequency coefficients
- Quantize coefficients (lossy step)
- Apply Huffman coding to compressed coefficients
DEFLATE Algorithm - PNG Standard
DEFLATE combines LZ77 and Huffman coding for lossless compression:
Process:
- LZ77: Finds repeated byte sequences and replaces with (distance, length) pairs
- Huffman coding: Assigns shorter codes to frequently occurring symbols
- Filters: PNG applies prediction filters to reduce entropy before compression
VP8/AV1 - Modern Video Codec Foundations
WebP Lossy (VP8 based):
- Uses predictive coding and transform coding
- Better entropy coding than JPEG's Huffman
- Achieves 25-30% better compression than JPEG
AVIF (AV1 based):
- Advanced intra-prediction modes
- Larger transform blocks (up to 64x64)
- Context-adaptive binary arithmetic coding
- 50% better compression than JPEG
Implementation Best Practices
Algorithm-Based Format Selection
<!-- Photos: Use lossy compression (DCT-based) -->
<img src="photo.jpg" alt="Team photo" />
<!-- JPEG: DCT + Huffman -->
<img src="hero.webp" alt="Hero image" />
<!-- WebP: VP8 lossy -->
<img src="gallery.avif" alt="Gallery" />
<!-- AVIF: AV1 codec -->
<!-- Graphics: Use lossless compression (pattern-based) -->
<img src="logo.png" alt="Company logo" />
<!-- PNG: DEFLATE (LZ77 + Huffman) -->
<img src="icon.webp" alt="Icon" />
<!-- WebP: Predictive + entropy coding -->
Progressive Enhancement
<picture>
<!-- Modern browsers get best compression -->
<source srcset="photo.avif" type="image/avif" />
<source srcset="photo.webp" type="image/webp" />
<!-- Fallback for older browsers -->
<img src="photo.jpg" alt="Photo" loading="lazy" />
</picture>
CDN Automatic Selection
Most modern CDNs automatically choose the best compression:
- Upload original high-quality images
- CDN analyzes image content automatically
- Applies lossy compression to photos
- Applies lossless compression to graphics
- Serves optimized version to visitors
Popular Tools and CDNs
1. BunnyCDN (Recommended)
- Automatic compression type selection
- Smart quality adjustment
- Global PoPs for better performance
- Get $5 free credit
2. ImageKit
- AI-powered compression
- 20GB bandwidth + 3GB storage free
Quick tip: Most websites benefit from using both compression types. Let your CDN automatically choose the best algorithm and format for each image type.